fbpx
Skip to main content

MIDI Forum

Atsushi
Atsushi
Active Member
Joined: Mar 10, 2019
Last seen: Aug 20, 2024
Topics: 3 / Replies: 8
Reply
RE: MIDI 2.0 Why can a function block only have one "MIDI1" port ?

A UMP endpoint does cover multiple legacy ports (most of real world MIDI 1.0 devices would have at least one input and one output). Note that one Fu...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Legacy MIDI to MIDI 2.0 Registered and Assignable messages

Regarding [2], the UMP specification says (at P.104): > MIDI 1.0 Protocol Increment (CC 96) and Decrement (CC 97) messages are translated to ...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Why is UMP MIDI2 controller limited to a 7 bits index (UMP spec 7.4.6 MIDI 2.0 Control Change Message)

I support the current specification and the overall strategy that the specification implements regarding backward compatibility in CC index. DAWs do n...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: MIDI 2.0 Why can a function block only have one "MIDI1" port ?

I guess you are taking the mentioned number differently. "The Number of Groups Spanned" is not the number of MIDI 1.0 ports. The number of spanned gro...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Processing concurrent MIDI Message Reports

It is good to know that my Q is not kind of dumb 😉 > If the Device supports ChCtrlLIst/AllCtrlList PE messages then you could compare the incom...

7 months ago
Reply
RE: MIDI-CI Property Exchange: adding new element to a JSON array in partial updates

Hi, Could you please elaborate on this - > for simplicity and interoperability reasons. I do not see any particular need for interoperability...

8 months ago
Reply

Hello, Thanks Andrew for all the verification and Mike for the status updates. I will wait for the revised updates and apply changes to my implemen...

1 year ago
Reply

I did (do) have some implementation code for a UMP-based SMF alternative format in my MIDI 2.0 library, and it is also based on big endian.br /> It...

1 year ago