MIDI Forum

I'm not sure what are you complaining about. Even if preliminary work is undergoing on the updated USB-MIDI protocol and AVBTP/RTP transport formats, ...

I did not miss anything. The MIDI 2.0 protocol supports 32 bit precision and it's up to instrument manufacturers to decide how to implement it - but ...

I don't think UMP-capable devices would need new Class IDs, but the protocols will have to be updated since current USB-MIDI Device Class Definition 1...

Pitch bend wheel resolution of 10 or 14 bits has nothing to do with the limited physical movement of a potentiometer or the mechanical tension of the ...

JR Timestamp messages are intended as a prefix to Channel Voice messages (i.e. notes/controllers/pitch-bend/pressure), so that several events in a ser...

As for connections it all needs to be done through Ethernet it's much more reliable than USB when you start scaling your setupFully agree here. USB is...

MPE seems to be a bodge to get around the limits of only one PolyAftertouch channel and destroys multitimbrality It's not as dramatic, the MPE protoc...

Don't you think Roli will be one of the leading companies to use MIDI 2.0? Sure, ROLI seem to take very active part in MIDI 2.0 development and testin...

some applications throttle what they send out to MIDI 1.0 speeds because currently the computer does not know if the external MIDI Out connection is g...

Can you honestly see manuafacturers implementing Ethernet in their devices? Yes, I can. Ethernet over twisted pair is commonplace technology by now, w...

What manufacturers implement in their equipment is a matter solely down to the market requirements as they see them, nothing to do with the MMA. MMA e...

31250 bps would be grossly inadequate for 32-bit controllers on 16x16 channels. It was already inadequate back in 1990s. I'd just require all MIDI ...